BILL ANOMALIES IMPLEMENTATION PACIFIC ETHENOL YOUR CAR HB2210 SB1079

Stop Mandatory Ethanol In Oregon!

Did you know that on July 3, 2007 Governor Ted Kulongoski signed HB 2210, mandating that all gasoline sold in Oregon contain 10% Ethanol without exception?

Late Breaking News

Pangs of Conscience Are Setting In As Economy Tanks

  • 24 July 2008: Democratic State Senator Viki Walker Flip/Flops when her precious Prius takes huge mileage hit on ethanol.
  • 14 August 2008: Oregon House Republicans Flip/Flop and propose empty gesture to repeal HB-2210 ethanol mandate.
  • 7 November 2008: Oregon now has the highest average gasoline price in the Northwest according to AAA and ethanol now costs more than the gasoline that it is blended with to make E10, according to DTN.

The new law will have the following negative economic impact on all Oregonians:

  • The price of gasoline will go UP.
     
  • Your mileage will go DOWN. (See: http://zfacts.com/p/436.html )
     
  • Many vehicles will suffer mechanical effects from ethanol, some of them serious, possibly including the complete destruction of their fuel system. Your insurance WILL NOT cover this damage! This is especially true for cars built before 1982 because ethanol is a solvent and these cars don't necessarily have ethanol proof parts like gaskets, O-rings and rubber fittings in their fuel system. Google "ethanol problems". This is my favorite story which goes to prove that it isn't just old cars that may have problems with E10. The greatest effect of this bill will be on the most vulnerable people in Oregon, who are scraping by on minimum wage, but not a living wage, since they are the majority of the people driving much older cars that may not be particularly well maintained and I know some of them are living in those cars. E10 may destroy their car but they will have no choice. In fact, with the total lack of media coverage, they won't even know why their cars died.
     
  • Many boats will be affected by ethanol, especially older, classic boats for the same reason as older cars.
    (See: http://www.daybreakfishing.com/ethanol-fuel.html and here: http://www.amlibpub.com/liberty_blog/2006/09/ethanol-damage.html and it looks like our legislators really should have read this: http://www.uscgboating.org/recalls/pdfs/BSC85_1.pdf, pg. 6-10, but then they never asked the Oregon State Marine Board to testify.)

     
  • All 2 cycle tools will be effected causing maintenance problems for tool rental businesses and businesses that rely on 2 cycle tools, like forest management and fire fighting crews and yard maintenance businesses. Apparently there was no concern for public safety when enacting this law, because the legislature never asked the Forest Service or any of the fire services to testify about how HB2210 will affect their tools. The bill will also affect snow mobiles, jet skis and all other 2 cycle engine powered recreational vehicles. This article summarizes the problems with ethanol and 2 cycle engines.
     

    Oregon is the only state that will send their fire fighters into battle with E10 in their tools. The legislature didn't bother to ask anyone in Public Safety if this was a good idea.

  • Gasoline stations may incur hefty costs because all storage tanks will have to be inspected and may have to be flushed out and new storage tank caps are required. Some of the one pump stations in eastern Oregon may just go out of business because it won't be economical to comply with the law.
    (See: http://oregon.gov/ODA/MSD/docs/pdf/gasoline_dealer_notice.pdf )
     
  • The entire gasoline delivery system will incur unspecified changeover costs as ethanol storage tanks and mixing equipment will have to be installed to handle at least 160 million gallons of ethanol / yr.
     
  • Many older airplanes that have paid for an STC to use unleaded fuel, instead of burning highly leaded airplane fuel that they weren't designed for, will have a worthless piece of paper and will have to go back to burning leaded fuel, thus polluting the environment even more, while incurring increased maintenance costs. But then the legislature never asked the Oregon Department of Aviation to testify.
     
  • If ethanol is the holy grail of clean air and energy independence, why does government on all levels have to guarantee market access and give out tax incentives or subsidies to business? Have you ever considered what it is doing to food costs when you convert a universal food grain to an energy supplement? And keep this in mind. HB 2210 creates a monopoly. The ethanol companies have guaranteed access to every gas tank you own. If a new wonder gasoline enhancement comes along and it is incompatible with ethanol, as ethanol was with MTBE, Oregon won't get it unless it changes the law and you know that the monopolist ethanol companies are going to fight that tooth and nail using your tax dollars. So how does ethanol clean up CO in your exhaust gasses, it converts it to CO2, a greenhouse gas! See: http://www.cei.org/gencon/019,05432.cfm Don't you just love the irony?
     
  • Hawaii is the only other state, so far, that has a mandatory E10 law with no exceptions. This article should give all Oregonians pause: http://starbulletin.com/2007/03/18/editorial/commentary3.html
     
  •  Here is something to ponder. It was pointed out to me by a gasoline distributor. Oregon makes about 40 million gallons of ethanol / yr. It needs at least 160 million gallons of ethanol / yr. It is the law that all gasoline in Oregon must have 10% ethanol in it, no exceptions. What if one or more gasoline terminals can't get enough ethanol for one reason or another. They must stop distributing gasoline. Even if they have gasoline, you can't have it.
     
  • If you get bad gasoline you need to tell the Oregon Department of Agriculture here: http://oda.state.or.us/dbs/fuel_complaint/fuel_complaint.lasso
     
  • And as if you didn't already have enough to worry about with ethanol, now this: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hkfJr7eBlUGNeJW2UuEctWBVfhQQD8V28S580
    Is your fire department prepared?

 

HB 2210 passed in the House 53 - 4 and passed in the Senate 24 - 3

Your legislators probably voted for this bill. I urge you to contact your legislators and ask them to repeal this law or at least exempt premium unleaded from ethanol blending as all other mandatory E10 states do.

If you click on the legislators name below you will be redirected to their legislative web site that includes their Salem office address, phone number and email address. Numbers in () are the district they represent.

Republicans Who Voted For HB 2210
Democrats Who Voted For HB 2210

Rep. Viki Berger
Rep. Brian Boquist
Rep. Scott Bruun
Rep. Chuck Burley
Rep. Tom Butler
Rep. Kevin Cameron
Rep. Bill Garrard
Rep. Vic Gilliam
Rep. George Gilman
Rep. Fred Girod
Rep. Bruce Hanna
Rep. Bob Jensen
Rep. Wayne Krieger
Rep. Jerry Krummel
Rep. Ron Maurer
Rep. Donna Nelson
Rep. Andy Olson
Rep. Dennis Richardson
Rep. Greg Smith
Rep. Patti Smith
Rep. Gene Whisnant
Sen. Jason Atkinson
Sen. Ted Ferrioli
Sen. Gary George
Sen. Frank Morse
Sen. David Nelson
Sen. Bruce Starr
Sen. Doug Whitsett

Salem (20)
Dallas (23)
West Linn (37)
Bend (54)
Ontario (60)
Salem (19)
Klamath Falls (56)
Molalla (18)
Medford (55)
Stayton (17)
Roseburg (7)
Pendleton (58)
Gold Beach (1)
Wilsonville (26)
Grants Pass (3)
McMinnville (24)
Albany (15)
Central Point (4)
Heppner (57)
Corbett (52)
Sun River (53)
Central Point (2)
John Day (30) Sen. Republican Leader
Newberg (12)
Albany (8)
Pendleton (29)
Hillsboro (15)
Klamath Falls (28)

Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Phil Barnhart
Rep. Terry Beyer
Rep. Suzanne Bonamici
Rep. Deborah Boone
Rep. Peter Buckley
Rep. Ben Cannon
Rep. Brian Clem
Rep. Jean Cowan
Rep. Jackie Dingfelder
Rep. Chris Edwards
Rep. David Edwards
Rep. Larry Galizio
Rep. Sara Gelser
Rep. Mitch Greenlick
Rep. Paul Holvey
Rep. Dave Hunt
Rep. Betty Komp
Rep. Tina Kotek
Rep. Greg Macpherson
Rep. Jeff Merkley
Rep. Nancy Nathanson
Rep. Mary Nolan
Rep. Tobias Read
Rep. Chuck Riley
Rep. Arnie Roblan
Rep. Diane Rosenbaum
Rep. Mike Schaufler
Rep. Chip Shields
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
Rep. Brad Witt
Sen. Brad Avakian
Sen. Alan Bates
Sen. Kate Brown
Sen. Ginny Burdick
Sen. Peter Courtney
Sen. Richard Devlin
Sen. Betsy Johnson
Sen. Rick Metsger
Sen. Laurie Monnes Anderson
Sen. Rod Monroe
Sen. Floyd Prozanski
Sen. Kurt Schrader
Sen. Joanne Verger
Sen. Vicki Walker
Sen. Ben Westlund

Aloha (28)
Eugene (11)
Springfield (12)
Washington County (34)
Cannon Beach (32)
Ashland (5)
Portland (46)
Salem (21)
Newport (10)
Portland (45)
Eugene (14)
Hillsboro (30)
Tigard (35)
Corvallis (16)
Portland (33)
Eugene (8)
Oak Grove (40)
Woodburn (22)
Portland (44)
Lake Oswego (38)
Portland (47) Speaker of the House
Eugene (13)
Portland (36)
Portland (27)
Hillsboro (29)
Coos Bay (9)
Portland (42) Speake Pro Tempore
Happy Valley (48)
Portland (43)
Milwaukie (41)
Clatskanie (31)
Portland (17) Assistant Majority Leader
Ashland (3)
Portland (21)
Portland (18)
Salem (11) Senate President
Tualatin (19) Senate Majority Leader
Scappoose (16)
Welches (26)
Gresham (25)
Portland (24)
Eugene (4)
Canby (20)
Coos Bay (5)
Eugene (7)
Tumalo (27)

You will not find the voting record of your legislator on the Oregon State Legislature web site easily. It can't be tracked by Google, and they don't automatically put it on each legislator's web site, even though they provide each legislator with their own web site. Apparently they don't believe that it is important to publish how our representatives vote in a manner that it is easy to find out. Using Google, I was able to dig through conservation web sites to find this information. I used this one, so there may be some discrepancies.

There are a number of curious anomolies in HB 2210 that should be investigated. They are discussed here.

Copyright 2007© Laptop4Hire™ All rights reserved.
Email: dean@laptop4hire.com